Hi all,
I want to create a TD shipment only information on Vehicles tab. How can we create a TD shipment number without vehicle number?
Pls help me,
Thanks,
↧
O4F1 - Create TD shipment without vehicle number
↧
Difference Screen VT01N
Hi guys,
I need your help.
I have 02 differences between server.
In DEV i have screen with visible VTTS_ALL-SDABW and VTTS_ALL-SKALSM and
modifed.
But em QLT, is not visible and a not possible insert in screen.
In analyses the configuration(SE51- Screen 1300 Program SAPLSTAG ) is same for both server and no have SHD0
for this process.
I need change screen for used the fields VTTS_ALL-SDABW and VTTS_ALL-
SKALSM in QLT and PRD.
↧
↧
Shipment creation
I would prefer to create the shipments by addining the Deliveries without having the routes entered in the Deliveries and then using user exit update the Routes into the Deliveries using the route from shipment header, but the problem I am having is if the Route is not entered in the Deliveries those deliveries are not being selected in the shipment document because the indicator "Transportation Planning status " VBUK-TRSTA " in the deliveries is not set untill the Route is entered.
One option I am thinking is to use a default route so that Deliveries are set for Transportation planning relevance and then update the correct route using the user exit from shipment header
Any suggestions ?
↧
Carrier is not printed on delivery note LD00 for return delivery types NCR, NLR
Hello Team,
I know that in standard delviery type, carrier is fetched from customer master and printed on delviery note. But in returns, carrier is not printed on the delivery note.
When we had a check from abaper in the debug mode, code was such that it checks transportation planning status for getting carrier information to print on delivery note.
If transportation planning status is A or C, it will print carrier on the delviery note.
Else it will not.
For Return delivery types like NCR, NLR, transportation planning status is blank (Not relevant for transportation). Hence in this case it is not printed.
Is there some business logiic behind this ?
I am not sure why SAP has designed code this way, since how printing of carrier is related to transportation planning status.
Any explanation on business logic or why such code was designed is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vaibhav
↧
delivery trans. plan. status
Hello people,
I would like to ask you for help in this scenario:
- we have two deliveries D1 (replenishment delivery between shipping points) and D2 ( delivery to customer) which are transport relevant "Transportation planning status" = A
- then there is shipment 1
- delivery D1 is transferred from shipping point 1 to shipping point 2 and remains here - shipment ends here
- delivery D2 is transferred from shipping point 1 to shipping point 2 and is waiting for other shipment
- this shipment has to have these deliveries as they are - it is not possible to separate them into two shipments - our forwarder is using it together and we have to accept this
- shipment 2 is created
- delivery D2 is shipped from shipping point 2 to customer - shipment ends here
What I would like to achieve is:
- shipment 1 is created (shipment 2 will be created later)
- D1 should have "Transportation planning status" = C
- D2 should have "Transportation planning status" = B - shipment is not finished yet
- in ideal way there could be two stages
- stage 1 for D1 - maybe "direct"?
- stage 2 for D2 - maybe "main"?
- after shipment 2 is created
- D2 should have "Transportation planning status" = C - shipment is finished now
Question:
- is it possible to have shipment 1 as I suggested at once?
- is it possible for shipment 1 and shipment 2 to have only 1 shipment type?
- could you provide any idea how to solve this?
What I know according to the help and experience:
- if shipment type is type "direct", delivery will be always "C" - it skips "B" status - possible solution for shipment 2 but not for shipment 1 (I still would like to have only 1 shipment type)
- if I tried to use different shipment types (not "direct") and played with stages and its "Leg indicator" I was never able to achieve requested statuses for shipment 1 deliveries
Thank you
David
↧
↧
Auto-assign Fwd Agent and Shipment route to Shipment through VT04
Hello guys,
I'm having some problems while trying to automatize the Fwd Agent and Shipment route in each Inidividual Shipment I create through T-code VT04 (Collective Processing).
When I create Shipments through this T-code, the fields I mentioned stay blank, even though I assigned to each Delivery its Route. The thing I'm trying to do is to collectively create different Shipments based on Grouping Criteria: Route. Then, even though it correctly creates the proper shipments, it doesn't automatically assign to each them the Fwd Agent and the Route.
This leads to two direct problems: It decreases the automatization I'm after for this specific process (I'd like to create shipments and then just Plan them for Goods Issue and Billing, directly) and it difficults the Shipment Selection through T-Code VT11 (i.e. my client wouldn't be able to selec Shipments based on Routes or on Agents, since there was no direct assignment).
Manually, the process works just fine. I've configured Routes and I assigned to each Route its Fwd Agent in T-Code 0VTC.
Thank you very much in advance for your help and attention,
Manuel Nascimento
↧
SAP Business One - Profit Per Truck Configuration
Hi Gurus,
I have been asked by my company (3rd party logistics) to look at the current SAP configuration as there is a current struggle to view the profits per truck. I am new the the world of SAP, and am enjoying the learning curve.
From the discussions in SCN that I have read, there seems to be a definite tendency to structure trucks as a profit center. Currently the trucks in the system have been defined as projects.
From the above I have two initial questions
1. The trucks as projects strategy seems quite limiting (from my limited point of view) and would like to ask if it would be the right decision to start looking at moving towards the profit centre design?
2. The current version of SAP (8.82.070 PL:07) doesn't have the Profit Centre module under the Financials -> Cost Accounting menu - even though the documentation I have found refers to this being standard - is this because of the version of SAP B1?
Look forward to any help that can be provided.
Thanks,
Daniel
↧
VT01N : How to change the variants without SE38?
Hello experts,
I would like to change the variants for the transaction VT01N without using SE38.
Could anyone give me some guidelines or tip offs.
Thanks,
Shubhendu Tripathi
↧
Transportation RV56ABST
Hi.
I am using the report RV56ABST in transaction VT01N for post goods issue and billing.
When the billing is delivery related it is working fine, but when the billing is order related (credit) it is doing just the goods issue and is not billing the order.
Does anybody knows how can I solve this?
Thanks,
Gustavo.
↧
↧
How to Transmit Manufacture Date into an Inbound ASN IDoc
Hi All,
I need URGENT help/suggestions on the way to transmit a manufacturing date into the inbound delivery vl31n transaction
There is no field at item segment in the IDoc which can be used to represent manufacturing date. I believe it will be stored in LIPS-HSDAT which is the manufacturing date field in inbound delivery.
Is there a standard way of doing this requirement?
Please help.
Thanks in advance,
Shona
↧
Global Freight Forwarding and Customs Brokerage
Hello,
Currently researching SAP, and am looking for information RE how SAP supports global freight forwarding and customs brokerage features. Is this a fairly well developed feature set of SAP via existing modules? If so, which modules should I be reviewing to begin to understand better what functionality exists "out of the box."
Also, if support materials/documentation exists for these modules I would greatly appreciate being pointed at them.
Thank you
Jeff
↧
Access not made (initialized field)
Hi,
I can notcalculate the cost offreight in VI01.
I created therecordconditions, but the systemdid notcalculateanything.
If I goin the analysistells me that:
But I haveaddedthe 'Bulkiness Group' in the record conditions.
What could be theproblem?
Thanks a lot.
↧
storage bin does not exist check your entry - message no: L9009
Dear Experts,
I mistakenly deleted the assignment of Plant, Storage Location and warehouse ( SPRO > IMG > Enterprise Structure > assignment > Logistics Execution > assign warehouse number to plant/storage location ) and reassigned them again after 5 mins, but it seems like it has emptied the whole warehouse or plant . Because when I am doing 'post good issue' in delivery document it gives me an error that this material does not exist in warehouse A01. How can i fix this problem?
2-) And would deleting an warehouse/plant assignment will all the material in all other warehouses ? The project i am working on has 4 warehouses.
↧
↧
Automatic packing in Shipment document
Hi
Below are two scenarios where i need guidance.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario - 1
My scenario is such where i need to have automatic packing at delivery as well as shipment level.
First the material will be packed under HU in the delivery automatically. This is happening as required.
Similarly multiple such deliveries will be created.
All those delivery will be packed under single pallet in the shipment document. I need to make this packing automatic. Means as soon as i create shipment, system shall automatically pack the HUs from different deliveries into the single pallet.
Can you please let me know that whether this is possible and if yes then how?
--------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario - 2
Here i want Automatic packing to be done directly at shipment level, means material will not be packed in delivery but will be packed directly in shipment.
Here i have done the entire required configuration for automatic packing in shipment.
By doing so, system is determining the packing proposal but to pack the items i need to manually click on "Automatic Packing" button in the shipment document. Then only the material are being packed unlike the delivery where the material will be packed automatically as soon as we create the delivery.
I think in delivery it might be happening because we have button to activate automatic packing in delivery at the delivery document type configuration (OVLK), but such setting is missing in the shipment type configuration.
Can you please let me know if there is a way to pack materials automatically in shipment without clicking on "Automatic Packing"?
Thanks,
Ritesh Tailor
↧
incorrect GI qty VS transfer order
Dear Expert,
My customer came across the the case for outbound delivery in 10 qty and did 2 transfer orders(9 qty and then 1qty) to fulfill the outbound delivery. when post the GI, system only deduct 9 qty and when they wanted to reverse the GI but DN but cannot be found.
I found a SAP Note 1640654 - Incorrect GI from mixed (own + consignment) stock tried to fix the problem, it could be the problem of sap version, the note could not be implement. Please advise thnk you.
Chi
↧
delivery trans. plan. status
Hello people,
I would like to ask you for help in this scenario:
- we have two deliveries D1 (replenishment delivery between shipping points) and D2 ( delivery to customer) which are transport relevant "Transportation planning status" = A
- then there is shipment 1
- delivery D1 is transferred from shipping point 1 to shipping point 2 and remains here - shipment ends here
- delivery D2 is transferred from shipping point 1 to shipping point 2 and is waiting for other shipment
- this shipment has to have these deliveries as they are - it is not possible to separate them into two shipments - our forwarder is using it together and we have to accept this
- shipment 2 is created
- delivery D2 is shipped from shipping point 2 to customer - shipment ends here
What I would like to achieve is:
- shipment 1 is created (shipment 2 will be created later)
- D1 should have "Transportation planning status" = C
- D2 should have "Transportation planning status" = B - shipment is not finished yet
- in ideal way there could be two stages
- stage 1 for D1 - maybe "direct"?
- stage 2 for D2 - maybe "main"?
- after shipment 2 is created
- D2 should have "Transportation planning status" = C - shipment is finished now
Question:
- is it possible to have shipment 1 as I suggested at once?
- is it possible for shipment 1 and shipment 2 to have only 1 shipment type?
- could you provide any idea how to solve this?
What I know according to the help and experience:
- if shipment type is type "direct", delivery will be always "C" - it skips "B" status - possible solution for shipment 2 but not for shipment 1 (I still would like to have only 1 shipment type)
- if I tried to use different shipment types (not "direct") and played with stages and its "Leg indicator" I was never able to achieve requested statuses for shipment 1 deliveries
Thank you
David
↧
Auto-assign Fwd Agent and Shipment route to Shipment through VT04
Hello guys,
I'm having some problems while trying to automatize the Fwd Agent and Shipment route in each Inidividual Shipment I create through T-code VT04 (Collective Processing).
When I create Shipments through this T-code, the fields I mentioned stay blank, even though I assigned to each Delivery its Route. The thing I'm trying to do is to collectively create different Shipments based on Grouping Criteria: Route. Then, even though it correctly creates the proper shipments, it doesn't automatically assign to each them the Fwd Agent and the Route.
This leads to two direct problems: It decreases the automatization I'm after for this specific process (I'd like to create shipments and then just Plan them for Goods Issue and Billing, directly) and it difficults the Shipment Selection through T-Code VT11 (i.e. my client wouldn't be able to selec Shipments based on Routes or on Agents, since there was no direct assignment).
Manually, the process works just fine. I've configured Routes and I assigned to each Route its Fwd Agent in T-Code 0VTC.
Thank you very much in advance for your help and attention,
Manuel Nascimento
↧
↧
VT01N: Deliveries list includes PGI completed deliveries
Hi
While creating shipment through VT01N, in the selection for deliveries, we are giving the shipping point, a date range for the Delivery Date field, the total good movement status as 'A' and the Transportaion Planning Status as 'A, B'. But, the list of deliveries displayed includes those deliveries that have the transportaion planning status as 'C' and the Goods Issue status as 'C'. What could be the reason for having these deliveries in the list that can be included in the shipment?
Thanks for your attention.
Regards,
Ravi
↧
SAP A&D or DFPS for airline
Hello, there.
I'm collecting the funtional requirement from an airline for ERP implementation. I have found that some functions are in SAP A&D and other in DFPS. For example, SPEC2K, rotable management, initial provisioning etc. are included in A&D. But supporting funcions of flight operations such as flight order, flight plan are included in DFPS.
Are these two (A&D and DFPS) different solutions requiring difference license charge? Can I use A&D funciton while we implement DFPS only??? We need all functions in A&D and DFPS. Can any one give me the clear understanding bewteen SAP A&D and DFPS?
Thanks!!
Kyunghee
↧
SAP WM Group already processed
Guys. I looked up online for possible answers but no success
Problem: An open TR (total qty 50 )is assigned to a group from which there is a Transfer Order for 15 (already picked).
Now if I try to create TO for remaining TR quantity (35) via LT04. I get this warning message;
TR XXXXX is already assigned to a group XX XXXX.
If I ignore this message and proceed with TO creation. it creates TO without Group number.
Is there any way to create TO with the group number? Is it standard SAP behavior? Is there any notes or fix or config change?
PS: I believe since the group is already processed so it doesnt allocate it to future TO
↧